Shankar Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12798 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-550 Year-2024 Thana- MADHUBANI TOWN DistrictMadhubani ====================================================== Shankar Kumar Ram Son of Raj Kumar Ram Resident of Village - Guddi Gachi, Maharajganj, P.S. - Town, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shaishav Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(2), 126(2), 303(2), 308(5), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that petitioner is alleged to have demanded extortion from the informant and on refusal, it is alleged that Raunak Parwana stabbed the informant by knife causing injury. It is next submitted that petitioner by profession is a mason and was earlier working for the informant but later

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12798 of 2025(2) dt.28-03-2025 2/3 started working for Raunak Parwana and on the date of occurrence, the petitioner was accompanying Raunak Parwana on his motorcycle when an altercation took place in between Raunak Parwana and the informant leading to the occurrence. It is also submitted at the cost of repetition that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a mason, as such, why the petitioner would have demanded extortion from the informant. It is further submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence and specific allegation of assaulting the informant by knife is against Raunak Parwana.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Madhubani Town P.S. Case No. 550 of 2024, subject to the conditions as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12798 of 2025(2) dt.28-03-2025 3/3 laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

6. However, it is made clear that if the investigating officer of the case files an application bringing to the notice of the learned trial court that petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not cooperating in the investigation, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T