Prabhu Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12664 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Prabhu Sah S/o- Sri Hiraman Sah R/v- Sundargawan W.No-18, Ps- Gopalpur Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
XX D/o- XYZ R/v- Sundargawan W.No-18, Ps- Gopalpur Dist- West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sharad Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-03-2026 1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2), 351(2), 74, 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that while he had gone to attend the call of nature when accused persons including the petitioner came and threatened of dire consequences if the case instituted against them is not withdrawn, on objection, accused persons abused and Buddhan
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12664 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026 2/3 assaulted her by an iron rod causing injury on nose on account of which she fell when other accused assaulted with stick and rod causing injury and Guddu tore her salwar unveiling her, on alarm her family members came and took the informant home, further at 8 pm the informant along with her mother and sister went to the house of Buddhan, when 13 named accused persons abused and Banarsi assaulted her mother by stick while Guddu Tunna assaulted the informant and Banarsi assaulted her sister by axe causing injury on head, further Buhdhan and Banarsi assaulted her father and Tunna along with Nagmati Devi assaulted her brother.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, but then the order impugned inadvertently records that petitioner has antecedent of two cases. It is further submitted that father of the petitioner filed TS Case No. 150 of 2025 against father of the informant for resolving land dispute, as such he came to be implicated with no specific allegation of assault.
5.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12664 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026 3/3 6.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 136 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T