Tinku Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12417 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-971 Year-2025 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Tinku Kumar Son of Yogendra Prasad Resident of Village - Vegetable Market, P.S.- Jehanabad, District - Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ramchandra Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Makhadampur (Tehta O.P) P.S. Case No.971 of 2025, dated 11.12.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 305(A), 331 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per the FIR, the allegation against the petitioner is that he is involved in the theft of articles from the house of the informant and his family members.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the articles seized from the shop of the petitioner do not match the articles alleged to have been stolen from the house of the informant. The petitioner is not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12417 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026 2/3 named in the FIR, and his name transpired on the basis of the confessional statements of co-accused Suryakant Kumar, Rahul Kumar, and Nagendra Kumar. There is no allegation of any overt act against the petitioner. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Taking into account that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-1st, Jehanabad/ Successor Court in connection with Makhadumpur (Tehta O.P.) P.S. Case No.971 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS as well as the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document/ personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12417 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026 3/3 consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) shikha/- U T