Abhinandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3954 of 2016 ====================================================== Abhinandan Kumar, Son of late Balbeer Prasad Yadav, resident of vill + P.O.- Bhargama, P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Secretary, Revenue and Land Reform Department, Patna. 3.

The Collector, Madhepura, District- Madhepura. 4.

The Land Reforms Deputy Collector Udakishunganj, District- Madhepura. 5.

The Anchal Adhikari Chausa, District- Madhepura. 6.

Arun Kumar Munka, son of Late Gopal Kumar Munka, resident of Village and P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura.

7.

Deo Narayan Mistri, son of Late Ayodhi Mistri, resident of Village and P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Satyadeo Kumar- SC5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 20-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The prayer in the writ petition is for quashing the notice issued in Case No. 200 of 2013-14 by the respondent no.3, under the Bihar Land Dispute Resolution Act, 2009, by which the petitioner has been asked to appear. In the considered opinion of the Court, there cannot be any occasion to interfere in the matter when only a notice has been issued for a party to appear before the Authority.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3954 of 2016 dt.20-05-2019 2/2 Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ application so that he may appear in the case with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, in accordance with law, if any order adverse to his interest is passed in Case No. 200 of 201314. In view of the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed off as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. In case the petitioner appears pursuant to the notice impugned, within three weeks from today, along with a copy of this order, the case would be heard and decided on merit.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date