Ranjan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23077 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -215 Year- 2016 Thana -LAKHNAUR District- MADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Ranjan Paswan, Son of Bhogendra Paswan, resident of VillageBathnaha, P.S. Lakhanaur, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Lakhanaur P.S.Case No.215 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 414 & 401/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of one stolen Motorcycle from his house.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the house of the petitioner rather from outside of the house of the petitioner, while he was not available at his house. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody for about 4 1⁄2 months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23077 of 2017 (2) dt.17-05-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, and having clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Lakhanaur P.S.Case No.215 of 2016 dated 23.12.2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U