← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3388/2025disposed

Manoj Kumar Singh @ Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-20Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3388 of 2025 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar Singh @ Manoj Kumar Son of Jagdish Prasad Singh Resident of Village-Dighra Rampur Sah P.S. Sadar Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Additional Principal Secretary, Department of Irrgation, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Additional Principal Secretary, Department of Building Construction, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Commissioner, Tirthut Division, Muzaffarpur. 6.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

7.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Muzaffarpur. 8.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Muzaffapur East, District-Muzaffarpur. 9.

The Superintending Engineer, Building Construction, Muzaffarpur. 10.

The Circle Officer, Musahari Block, District-Muzaffarpur. 11.

The Block Development Officer, Musahari Block, District-Muzaffarpur. 12.

The Mukhia through the Panchayat Secretary, Kanhauli Bishundutt Gram Panchayat, Muzaffarpur.

13.

The Executive Engineer, Building Constriction, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md. Imteyaz Ahmad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Government Advocate (5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2025 Heard Md. Imteyaz Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G.A.-5, learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to convert the present writ application into Public

Patna High Court CWJC No.3388 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 2/2 Interest Litigation.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Office is directed to take necessary steps. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) priyanka/- U