Tabrez @ Habra @ Md. Tabrez v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20761 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2017 Thana -KOCHADHAMAN District- KISANGANJ ======================================================

1. TABREZ @ HABRA @ MD. TABREZ Son of Late Kalim, Resident of Village- Gouri Chauk, Police Station- Araria in the district of Araria, at present Resident of L.R.P. Chauk, P.S.- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Kochadhaman P.S.Case No.19A of 2017 for the offences under Sections 457, 380 & 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that the stolen articles have been recovered from his house and further the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has remained in custody for about five months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20761 of 2017 (3) dt.05-07-2017 2/2 petitioner has clean antecedent and the petitioner has remained in custody for about five months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Kishanganj in connection with Kochadhaman P.S.Case No.19 of 2017 (G.R.No.242 of 2017). With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U