Patna High CourtC. REV./73/2016dismissed

Md. Akhtar Ali v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-01Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.73 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4134 of 2014 ====================================================== Md. Akhtar Ali son of Safi Ansari @ Liakat Ali, Resident of VillageBangra (East), P.O.- Dumarsan Bangra, P.S.- Masarakh and District- Saran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Deputy Director, Primary Education, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, New Secretariate, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate at Chhapra, District- Saran.

5. The District Programme Officer at Chhapra, District- Saran.

6. The Block Education Officer and Block Development Officer at Marhaura, District- Saran.

7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Bangra, P.O.- Dumarsan Bangra, District- Saran

8. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bangra, P.O- Dumarsan Bangra, District- Saran.

9. District Teacher's Appointment Authority at Chhapra, Saran. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 01-03-2017 Heard counsel for the petitioner.

There has to be some error apparent on the face of record which would be required to be reviewed. In the garb of review, writ application cannot be argued de novo. No case for review is made out. Review application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Pawan/- U