Bindeshwari Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12315 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-839 Year-2018 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) * ====================================================== Bindeshwari Kumar Pandey, aged about 35 years, Male, Son of Late Krishna Kumar Pandey Resident of Village and P.O. - Chainpur, P.S.-Chainpur, P.S.- Chainpur, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satyendra Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Babhua P.S. Case No. 839 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 147, 341, 504, 353, 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation, the police received information that one person was caught with beef who was surrounded by fifty persons and, later on, they have blocked the movement of the traffic by the supporters.

There is no specific allegation against the present petitioner.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12315 of 2019(2) dt.28-02-2019 2/2 case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabua, Kaimur in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 839 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

It is also made clear that, in future, if the petitioner would be found again involved in such activity, the prosecution will be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T