Tinku Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3227 of 2016 ====================================================== Tinku Kumar Rai Son of Sri Dinesh Rai, resident of West of Pali Chowk, P.S. Kishanganj, District - Kishanganj.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Sone Bhawan, Patna.

3. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Kishanganj.

4. The District Magistrate, Kishanganj.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha, G.P.-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 15-07-2016 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the District Manager in not allotting him sufficient work despite an agreement entered in between him and the Corporation. Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the letter dated 18.9.2015 submits that directives were issued to the District Manager, Kishanganj to look into the matter and whereafter an agreement was entered in between the parties and yet the situation has not progressed and the petitioner is running without work despite deposit of 36 lacs security amount. It is submitted that the agreement entered in between the parties has been rendered nugatory by non-

Patna High Court CWJC No.3227 of 2016 (4) dt.15-07-2016 allotment of work.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of dispute raised, I deem it proper to direct the Managing Director of the Corporation to consider the grievance of the petitioner and dispose of the same for after deposit of Rs.36 lacs, the interest of the petitioner neither can be ignored nor the agreement can be allowed to be rendered nugatory. Considering that the validity period is to lapse shortly the grievance should be disposed of expeditiously and preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order.

(Jyoti Saran, J) deepika/- U