← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15547/2024bail granted

Awadhesh Kumar Yadav @ Awadhesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-12Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15547 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-347 Year-2023 Thana- SALAKHUA District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1.

Awadhesh Kumar Yadav @ Awadhesh Kumar Son of Jitendra Yadav Resident of Village- Kopariya, P.S.- Salkhua, District- Saharsa 2.

Bablu Kumar @ Babloo Kumar @ Bhakul @ Bhakul Yadav Son of Jawahar Yadav Resident of Village- Kopariya, P.S.- Salkhua, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 40 litres of liquor along with raw materials and utensils for manufacturing liquor from side of Khagma river. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15547 of 2024(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 recovery is from a place which is accessible to public at large and does not belong to the petitioners and they came to be implicated at the instance of Chowkidar with whom they are on an inimical term. It is also submitted that it appears that the Chowkidar, in order to save the real culprit, falsely implicated the petitioners, when petitioners admittedly are persons with clean antecedent.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Salkhua P.S. Case No. 347 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T