Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.363 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14486 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Archana Kumari D/o Raj Kumar Prasad, Wife of Ranjit Kumar, Resident of Village-Kolhubar, P.O.-Pipara, P.S.-Dumaria, District-Gaya. 2.
Anita Kumari D/o Ajit Kumar, Wife of Nagendra Prasad, resident of Village and P.O.-Shri Rampur, P.S. Sherghati, District-Gaya. 3.
Arpana Kumari D/o Rajendra Singh, Resident of Village- Juri Nawadih, P.O. and P.S.- Bankey Bazar, District- Gaya.
4.
Archana Kumari Wife of Kaushlendra Kumar, resident of Village-Juri Nawadih, P.O. and P.S.-Bankey Bazar, District-Gaya. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director (Primary), Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.
The District Magistrate, Gaya.
4.
The District Education Officer, Gaya.
5.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gaya. 6.
The Block Development Officer-cum-Secretary Block Teacher Niyojan Samiti, Imamganj, District- Gaya.
7.
The Block Education Officer, Imamganj, District- Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Apurva Kumar, AC to GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-05-2025 Re: I. A. No. 01 of 2023 The learned Advocate for the appellants presses I. A. No. 01 of 2023 for condoning the delay of 68 days in
Patna High Court L.P.A No.363 of 2023(3) dt.12-05-2025 2/2 preferring this appeal.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 68 days in filing this appeal is condoned.
3. I. A. No. 01 of 2023 stands allowed.
Re: L.P.A. No. 363 of 2023
4. After some arguments, Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, learned Advocate for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal in order to enable the appellants to approach any other forum for the needful.
5. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/Sujit U