Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14159 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2017 Thana- AKBARNAGAR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== PAPPU YADAV, Son of Late Bouku Yadav, Resident of Village - Ganga Nagar, P.S.- Akbarnagar, Distt.- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs. Pravina Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 07-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in Akbarnagar P.S. Case No.88 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 395, 397, 412, Indian Penal Code.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. No Test Identification Parade has been held. Nothing incriminating has been recovered. Name of the petitioner has come during investigation in the confessional statement of Akwa Mandal @ Uday Mandal. It is further submitted that one more criminal case is pending against the petitioner in which he is already on bail.
Counsel for the petitioner further submits that co-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14159 of 2019(2) dt.07-03-2019 2/2 accused, Akwa Mandal @ Uday Mandal, has already been granted regular bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 24.09.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No.41900 of 2018. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, I, Bhagalpur, in connection with Akbarnagar P.S. Case No.88 of 2017, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T