Basir Baitha And ORS v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15980 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.
Basir Baitha and Ors 2.
Safiruddin 3.
Shahabuddin Baitha. All Sons of Late Satim Baitha All Resident of VillageKhairagarhia, P.O.- Deviganj, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria. 4.
Sahina Khatoon, Wife of Md. Amin, Resident of Village- Khaira, Koshkapur, P.S.- Forbesganj, Dist- Patna.
5.
Hasina Khatoon, Wife of Masso Baitha, Resident of Village- Rampur, Basgraha, Both of P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union Of India and Ors 2.
Chairman, Railway Board, Cum Principal Secretary, Department of Railway, Government of India, Rail 3.
General Manager, East Central Railway Hajipur, District- Vaishali. 4.
East Central Railway Hajipur, District- Vaishali through its General Manager.
5.
Divisional Rail Manager, Samastipur Rail Division, Samastipur, DistrictSamastipur. 6.
Chief Administarative Officer/ Construction/ North Central Railway, Mahendru Ghat, Patna-1.
7.
The State of Bihar through Collector Araria, District- Araria. 8.
Collector, Araria, District- Araria.
9.
District Land Acquisition Officer, Araria District- Araria. 10.
Collector, Purnea, District- Purnea.
11.
District Land Acquisition Officer, Purnea, District- Purnea. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Ram Tujabh Singh, CGC Ms. Radhika Raman, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State and Central Government Counsels are present.
2. The present writ application has been preferred for: issuance of appropriate
Patna High Court CWJC No.15980 of 2016(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2 writ/order/direction commanding the respondents authority to make payment of compensation of the lands which details are mentioned in Para-3 of this application to the petitioner in accordance with law.
3. For want of prosecution, dismissed.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T