Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14297 of 2018 (2) dt.04-04-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14297 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -144 Year- 2017 Thana -PHULPARAS District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Sunil Yadav S/o Hariharnath Yadav, R/o Village- Siswabarhi, P.S.- Phulparas, District- Madhubani.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13, Advocate Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Adv Ms. Nitu Kumari No.7, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 14.10.2017, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 144 of 2017 (S.T. No.19 of 2018) for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148,149, 323, 324, 307, 353, 332, 333,427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 14.12.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 60091 of 2017.
3. It is submitted that charges have now been framed and as such there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody already suffered since 14.10.2017, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14297 of 2018 (2) dt.04-04-2018 satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Madhubani in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 144 of 2017 (S.T. No. 19 of 2018) on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T