Krishan Mohan Singh And ORS v. The Bihar School Examination Board And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2882 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Krishan Mohan Singh Son of Shiv Bilas Singh, Resident of Mohalla - Sarimpur (Buxar), P.O. - Buxar, Police Station - Buxar, District - Buxar.

2. Sunil Kumar Pal Son of Raja Ram Bhagat, Resident of Village - Jamunidihra, P.O. - Monikpur, Police Station - Dhansol, District - Buxar.

3. Ritesh Ranjan Son of Awadh Kishore Singh, Resident of Village - Ganj Bharasara, P.O. - Ganj Bharasara, Police Station - Dinara, District - Rohtas.

4. Anil Kumar Pandey, Son of Narad Muni Pandey, Resident of Mohalla - Van Shakti Nagar Charitra Van Buxar, P.O. - Buxar, Police Station - Buxar, District - Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar School Examination Board, Patna through its Secretary.

2. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.

3. The State of Bihar.

4. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Director, Primary - cum - Upper Primary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suman Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. HARISH KUMAR (GP32) =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-03-2015 *************** Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Taking into consideration the difficulty expressed by the Examination Board with regard to the relief, which the petitioners are seeking, which is for reevaluation of their OMR-sheet for the Bihar Elementary Teachers Eligibility Test, held in the year 2011, no direction at this distant period of time can be given in this regard. If the petitioners were cautious enough about their right, they should have approached

Patna High Court CWJC No.2882 of 2015 dt.24-03-2015 2/2 the High Court well within the time. Evaluation is not possible in the circumstances indicated by the respondents in the counter affidavit.

Writ application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/- U