Bibi Sakina v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12577 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2018 Thana- KATIHAR MUFFASIL District- Katihar ====================================================== Bibi Sakina, Wife of Md. Sarif @ Md. Safir, Resident of Village - Pokharia Gafoor Tola, P.S- Mufassil, Distt.- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vinay Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.206 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 452, 323, 354, 384, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the co-accused including the petitioner is to have demanded Rs. 50,000/- as ransom. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is delay of 22 days in lodging the complaint case by the complainant/informant. There is land dispute between the parties and both parties belongs to same family.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12577 of 2019(2) dt.06-03-2019 2/2 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case no.206 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a further condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/ S. Katyayan U T