Ram Swarath Paswan @ Ramsogarath Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13452 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2024 Thana- MAHISHI District- Saharsa ====================================================== Ram Swarath Paswan @ Ramsogarath Paswan Son of Suresh Paswan Resident of Village- Kusmi Ward No. 05, Tola Sarbela, P.S.- Banma Ttahari, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sameer Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 28-03-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State.
2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed under Section 482 of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as "BNSS, 2023") for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner who apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahishi P.S. Case No. 228 of 2024 lodged on 08.08.2024, for the offence punishable under Sections 316(2) & 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as "BNS, 2023").
3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against the sole petitioner against whom there is allegation that he was found unauthorizedly involved in transaction of money in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13452 of 2025(2) dt.28-03-2025 2/2 name of jamabandi in the premises of the Revenue Court.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel also submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. Counsel submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner is named in the FIR.
6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T