Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13928/2025bail rejected

Quazi Sarwar @ Gulam Sarwar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-21Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13928 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-313 Year-2024 Thana- BAISI District- Purnia ====================================================== Quazi Sarwar @ Gulam Sarwar Son of Hasimuddin Quazi @ Quazi Hasimuddin Resident of village- Khutia, ps- Baisi, Dist- purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Adv.

Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 313 of 2024, CIS No. 02/2025 dated 22.10.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 80 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the informant's sister by strangulation due to non-fulfillment of demand of five lakhs as dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased and he has no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13928 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 2/2 concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 07.12.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased who killed his wife due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. As per the post-mortem report of the deceased, the cause of death is asphyxia due to strangulation by ligature.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the heinous nature of offence is against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on bail.

7. The application stands rejected.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T