Pinki Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19283 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2022 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== Pinki Kumari, Wife Of Kailash Prasad Mandal, D/O Jaynandan Kumar R/O Village- Budhuchak, Post- Arajpur, P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura, Employed Primary Teacher School Navtoloiya, Panchayat- Nathpur, BlockRupauli, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar- Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ajay Mishra- A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2023

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission to remove the defects as pointed out by the office within a period of two weeks from today.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

4. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner secured appointed based on forged BTET certificate as a Panchayat Teacher.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19283 of 2023(2) dt.31-07-2023 2/2

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that the F.I.R. came to be instituted based on an inquiry conducted behind her back. It is further submitted that had an opportunity being given to the petitioner to explain her side of the case, perhaps the present F.I.R. would not have been instituted.

7. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

8. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Rupauli (Mohanpur) P. S. Case No.281 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

9. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T