Janendra Choudhary @ Jainendra Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12068 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2018 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== JANENDRA CHOUDHARY @ JAINENDRA CHOUDHARY, Son of Late Ram Pravesh Choudhary, Resident of Village - Baligaon, P.S.- Rajpur, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Barun P.S. Case No. 218 of 2018, instituted for the offence under Section(s) 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that charge sheet has already been submitted in the case.
It is alleged in the written report that informant withdrew Rs. 14,000/- from Punjab National Bank, Barun Branch, and had kept Rs.10,000/- in his right pocket and rest Rs.4,000/- in his left pocket. Thereafter, he was standing in queue for update of his passbook. He felt someone tried to pick his pocket. He turned and saw one person was putting his hand inside his pocket. The informant caught his hand, but he fled away after taking money
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12068 of 2019(2) dt.27-02-2019 2/2 from his pocket. The informant chased and with the help of other persons apprehended the petitioner who was handed over to the police. The amount of Rs.10,000/- has been recovered from possession of the petitioner.
Seizure list shows that Rs.10,000/- has been recovered from possession of the petitioner, which was identified by the informant.
Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
Prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail stands rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the same as early as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. Petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months in the event no substantive progress is made in the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T