Jitendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23818 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2017 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ====================================================== Jitendra Paswan, son of Nanhak Paswan, resident of village Chamandih, P.S. Chandauti, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Barachatti P.S.Case No. 101 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a), 38 & 47 of Bihar Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation as per FIR is that police intercepted a vehicle in which two persons were boarded and one of them fled away and from the vehicle 97 litres of foreign liquor have been recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has nothing to do with the seized articles and he has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody for three months having no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23818 of 2017 (2) dt.19-05-2017 2/2 facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghaty, Gaya, in connection with Barachatti P.S.Case No. 101 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U