Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21301/2017bail granted

Chandra Shekhar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-28Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21301 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2014 Thana -CHAUSA District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Chandra Shekhar Sharma, Son of late Jagdish Sharma, Resident of Village Laualagan @ Laualagam , P.S. Chousa, District Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier twice rejected vide order dated 11.12.2015 and 05.10.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. 49785 of 2015 and Cr. Misc. No. 43400 of 2016 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 24.02.2015, other co-accused has been allowed prearrest bail, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, there is allegation against two accused for assaulting the deceased but only one injury has been found.

The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail but fairly submits that trial has not been concluded within six months and the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21301 of 2017 (2) dt.28-06-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., UdaKishunganj, Madhepura, in connection with Chousa P.S. Case No. 45 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T