Dipak Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12292 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2018 Thana- RAJPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== Dipak Kumar Singh, Son of Kanhaiya Singh Resident of Village- Devdhiya, Police Station- Rajpur, District- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rahul Nath For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-06-2019 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 124 of 2018, registered under Sections 341, 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of the S.D.J.M., Buxar.

The accusation is of torturing of informant by her husband and other in-laws due to non-fulfillment of demand of cash and motorcycle and ousting her from her matrimonial house after snatching her personal belongings. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that, in fact, informant/O.P. No.2, who is wife of petitioner along with her mother and brother came at the house

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12292 of 2019(4) dt.17-06-2019 2/2 of petitioner and caused assault to the family members of the petitioner regarding which Rajpur P.S. Case No. 121 of 2018, under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code by uncle of the petitioner due to that reason present case has been lodged. However, petitioner is not ready to keep the informant of the present case due to her ill-behaviour. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial Court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T