Rahul Ghosh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5055 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2014 Thana -HABIBPUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Manoj Paswan son of Bholti Paswan
2. Parmanand Paswan son of Karu Paswan
3. Umesh Paswan son of Khusru Paswan All resident of Village - Daudbat, P.S. Habibpur, District - Bhagalpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.7295 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2014 Thana -HABIBPUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Rahul Ghosh Son of Bihari Ghosh, Resident of Village - Daudbat, P.S. - Habibpur, District - Bhagalpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.5055 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Janki Nandan Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Arif(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.7295 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Janki Nandan Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kr.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 10-03-2015 Heard both sides.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Habibpur P.S. Case No. 64 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5055 of 2015 (3) dt.10-03-2015 2/2 The informant alleged that while he was going on his car many persons surrounded him and assaulted the informant and also damaged the vehicle of the informant. Belongings of the informant were also snatched.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a child was killed in a motor accident for which Habibpur P.S. Case No. 62 of 2014 was registered. The villagers had blocked the road. The informant named the petitioners, but did not disclose the source of identity. The mob pelted stones and assaulted the informant. The informant got simple injuries.
It appears that the petitioner was a passer-by and he was passing through the road on a vehicle, but the petitioners along with other accused persons assaulted the informant and also badly damaged his vehicle.
Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T