Satrudhan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15676 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-457 Year-2023 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== Satrudhan Yadav S/o Nande Keshwar @ Nand Keshwar Yadav R/o VillageMarduya, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Tekari P.S. case No. 457 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 447, 448, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 354, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that on the alleged date and time of occurrence, the petitioner and other co-accused assaulted the informant and her family members. It is specifically alleged that this petitioner gave iron rod blow on the head of the father-in-law of the informant, as a result of which he became unconscious and fell on the ground.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15676 of 2024(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that there is specific allegation on this petitioner of assaulting the father-in-law of the informant but on perusal of the injury report of the father-in-law of the informant it appears that the injury sustained by him are simple in nature, hence, no offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code are made out. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2023 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Tekari P.S. case No. 457 of 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T