Binda Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22058 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2002 Thana -KINJAR District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Binda Thakur Son of Shri Muni Thakur, Resident of Village- Bagahi, P.S.- Parasbigha, District- Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier petitioner had moved before this Court with a prayer for bail which was rejected vide order dated 1.3.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 2808 of 2017 with an observation that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although there is allegation against him of defalcation of money but he is in no way concerned with the said money and he is brother of the contractor. It is further submitted that charge has been framed in this case. Petitioner has remained in custody for eight months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22058 of 2017 (2) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-IV, Arwal, in connection with Kinjar P.S. Case no. 8 of 2002 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T