← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3897/2016disposed

Rohit Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-05-08Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 3897 of 2016 ====================================================== Rohit Kumar Jha, Son of Late Shukdeo Jha, Resident of Village and P.O. Basauna, P.S. - Bangaon, District - Saharsa, presently working as Key man/ Chaukidar in Public Health Sub - Division, Areraj under Public Health Division, Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Engineer - in - Chief -cum - Additional Secretary - cum - Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Chief Engineer (Mechanical), Public Health Engineering Department, Muzaffarpur.

5.

The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Circle, Motihari. 6.

The Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Division, Motihari. 7.

The Sub - Divisional Officer (Assistant Engineer), Public Health Sub - Division, Areraj, District - Motihari ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

M/s Vijay Kr Singh, Santosh Kr, Advocates For the Respondent/s :

Ms Anuradha Singh, SC XXI ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 08-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

It is submitted by the petitioner's counsel that having regard to the communication of the Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Motihari dated 22.12.2015; respondent No 4 is obliged to consider the claim of the petitioner for benefits of his service rendered as work charge employee prior to his regular

Patna High Court CWJC No.3897 of 2016(2) dt.08-05-2019 2/2 employment dated 29.11.2006.

Since the claim of the petitioner is already pending, this Court would expect that final decision be taken by respondent No 4 expeditiously and without any undue delay. Writ petition is disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U