Patna High CourtCWJC/2995/2012dismissed

Braj Kishore Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-04-28Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2995 of 2012 ===================================================

1. Braj Kishore Singh Son of Late Mahendra Singh Resident of Sekhpura, Sadhu Gachi, Akharaghat, P.S. Ahiyapur , Town and District Muzaffarpur

2. M/S Gaurav Construction, through its Partner Vinay Kumar Son of Late Kailash Singh Resident of Panchbhirwa, P.O. Madhaul District Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Patna

2. The Engineer in Chief R. C. D., Patna

3. The Chief Engineer, R. C. D., Patna

4. The Superintending Engineer, R.C.D. Muzaffarpur Circle, Muzaffarpur

5. The Technical Advisor to S.E. RCD Muzaffarpur Circle Muzaffarpur

6. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Division 2, Muzaffarpur

7. M/S Shail Construction, Mohalla Satpura, Town & P.S. Muzaffarpur through its Partner Mr. Rajiv Kumar .... .... Respondents =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Mayanand Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manikant Mishra GP25 =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 28-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the decision of the respondents disqualifying the technical bid of the petitioner in connection with construction of 2 RCC culverts at 20 & 23 Kms. of Runni Saidpur-Katra Kwetsa Road under Road

Patna High Court CWJC No.2995 of 2012 (3) dt.28-04-2016 Construction Department, R.C. Div. No.2, Muzaffarpur pursuant to NIT under e-tendering system dated 24.10.2011.

3. At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that the writ petition has now become infructuous by efflux of time.

4. In that view of the matter, the application is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.

Chandran (Vikash Jain, J) U