Dharmendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21935 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2017 Thana -HASPURA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Dharmendra Singh Son of Sheo Prasad Singh Resident of VillageGangepur, P.S. Haspura, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha & B.K. Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner is in custody since 09.03.2017 in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. - 45 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 8-20 (b) (II) (A) N.D.P.S. Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 100 grams of ganja from his house and further allegation is that police intercepted the other co-accused person with 1.900 kg of ganja and he had stated that he had purchased from the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the recovery of ganja was within the small quantity and the petitioner is in custody for more than three months.

Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21935 of 2017 (3) dt.23-06-2017 2/3 Having heard both sides and considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000(Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Daudnagar, in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 45 of 2017, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part two appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21935 of 2017 (3) dt.23-06-2017 3/3 (iv) If petitioner is involved in such type of cases in future, the learned court below shall cancel his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) khushbu/- U T