Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21730/2017rejected

Md. Rasool Mian @ Md. Rasool v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-21Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21730 of 2017 (2) dt.21-06-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21730 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2013 Thana -KUMARGHAND District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Md. Rasool Mian @ Md. Rasool Son of Late Fida Mian, Resident of Village- Yaduapatti, P.S.- Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Prasad Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ahtash Ali Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier thrice rejected vide order dated 18.03.2015, 28.03.2016 and 07.12.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1296 of 2015, 4322 of 2016 and 47304 of 2016 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 28.09.2014 and out of 15 chargesheet witnesses only 11 prosecution witnesses have been examined and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded to which learned APP opposes by submitting that the petitioner assaulted the deceased on his head with Dabiya and also cut his both legs.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21730 of 2017 (2) dt.21-06-2017 petitioner, again his prayer for bail stands rejected. However, learned trial court is again directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after taking all the positive steps for securing the attendance of rest of the prosecution witnesses, failing which, the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T