Saurabh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14835 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2017 Thana -KASHICHAK District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. Saurabh Kumar, Son of Late Vinay Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Khojagachhi, P.S. Barbigha, District- Sheikhpura. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 18.05.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23546 of 2017, with direction to the court below to expedite and conclude the trial within a period of nine months and petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period.
Submission of learned counsel for the above period of nine months have already expired and there is no likelilihood of conclusion of trial in near future and he has been in judicial custody for more than a year.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14835 of 2018 (3) dt.04-04-2018 2/2 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM- Nawada, in connection with Kashichak (Sahpur) P.S. Case No. 08 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T