Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23689/2017dismissed

Ankur Sharma v. The Union Of India Through Narcotics Department And ANR

2017-09-20Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23689 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2017 Thana -RAXAUL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Ankur Sharma, son of Binod Sharma, H. No.- 180, resident of villagePanewati Colony, Part-2, Police Station- Kotwali, Tahsil- Ghaziabad, District- Ghaziabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through Narcotics Department.

2. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP For the Union of India : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 9/ 20-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in NDPS Case No.14 of 2017 arising out of Raxaul P.S. Case No.24 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 20, 22, 23 & 24 of the NDPS Act pending in the Court of the Sessions Judge/Special Judge, East Chamapran, Motihari.

Report of the Forensic Science Laboratory has been received.

It is alleged that 1.470 gr. Charas was recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Seizure list was prepared. Seizure list and confessional statement of the petitioner made before the police have been enclosed with the First Information

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23689 of 2017 (9) dt.20-09-2017 2/2 Report.

Report of the Forensic Science Laboratory was called for, which has been received. It is mentioned in the report of the Forensic Science Laboratory that the article recovered from the possession of the petitioner was found to be Charas. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Accordingly, prayer for bail is rejected.

Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T