← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15949/2023allowed

Sujeet Kewat v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-26Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15949 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2017 Thana- PALI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

SUJEET KEWAT SON OF PREMAM KEWAT R/O VILLAGEDAMUHA, HAZIPUR, P.S.- KAKO, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD 2.

UMESH KEWAT @ UMESH KUMAR SON OF SARJOO KEWAT R/O VILLAGE- DAMUHA, HAZIPUR, P.S.- KAKO, DISTRICTJEHANABAD 3.

MAHENDRA KEWAT SON OF SARJOO KEWAT R/O VILLAGEDAMUHA, HAZIPUR, P.S.- KAKO, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD 4.

PREMAN KEWAT SON OF SARJOO KEWAT R/O VILLAGEDAMUHA, HAZIPUR, P.S.- KAKO, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 448, 504, 354 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of POCSO Act. The allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused persons molested and assaulted the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15949 of 2023(3) dt.26-06-2023 2/2 occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He further submits that the police has filed final form against the petitioners but differing with the same learned Court below took cognizance against them. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Pali P.S. Case No.16 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T