Sanoj Kumar @ Lootan Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.21909 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -42 Year- 2017 Thana -OBRA District- AURANGABAD ======================================================
1. Sanoj Kumar @ Lootan Yadav S/o Bindeshwar Singh R/o VillageBatura, P.S. Jamhore, District- Aurangabad(Bihar).
2. Rajan Singh S/o Ramvilash Singh R/o Village-Kara, P.S. Obra , District- Aurangabad(Bihar).
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Obra P.S.Case No.42 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation against the petitioners is about recovery of 84 ltrs. of country-made liquor.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have clean antecedent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and remained in custody for more than three months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of clean antecedent and remain in custody for more than three months, as such, let the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21909 of 2017 (2) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Obra P.S.Case No.42 of 2017. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U