Pappu Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23053 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -59 Year- 2017 Thana -SURSAND District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Pappu Kumar son of Laxmi Kamat

2. Rahul Kumar son of Ashok Kamat Both residents of village - Parigama, P.S. Pupri, District Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Rani Prasadd, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

This is an application for bail in connection with Sursand P.S.Case No. 59 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against the petitioners is of recovery of 10 litres of Nepali wine.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they have falsely been implicated in this case and they are in custody for more than two months.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23053 of 2017 (2) dt.16-05-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi, in connection with Sursand P.S.Case No. 59 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U