Vicky Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14074 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2009 Thana- KORANSARAI District- Buxar ====================================================== Vicky Yadav S/O Ramadhar Yadav R/O Village- Araila, P.S- Dumraon, Distt.- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satyapal Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 333 of 2009 arising out of Koran Sarai P.S. Case No. 08 of 2009 dated 03.03.2009 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 394, 395 and 412 of the IPC of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants are alleged to have looted the informant's mobile phone and purse on the point of pistol.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. Nothing has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14074 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 2/3 been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 18.05.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17113 of 2010. It is further submitted that the petitioner was residing outside of the State for his livelihood and he could not appear physically before the learned trial court due to that the bail bond of the petitioner was cancelled on 22.08.2023. It is a first misuse of privilege of bail granted to the petitioner. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 21.01.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Buxar in connection with Sessions Trial No. 333 of 2009 arising out of Koran Sarai P.S. Case No. 08 of 2009, with the condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14074 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 3/3 present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T