← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17714/2018bail granted

Jagu Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-29Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17714 of 2018 (2) dt.29-03-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17714 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -608 Year- 2017 Thana -SIWAN MUFFASIL District- SIWAN ====================================================== Jagu Choudhary, Son of Ram Kailash Choudhary, Resident of Village-Siari Mathiya, P.S.-Siwan Muffasil, District-Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 608 of 2017 registered under Sections 30(a) and 37(b) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2016. The accusation is that, on seeing the police party, one person started to flee away throwing his bag, but on chased, he was apprehended in drunken state and in his presence, his bag was searched, from which, 10 bottles each containing 200 ML country made liquor was recovered.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that alleged country made liquor was not recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and petitioner is in custody since

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17714 of 2018 (2) dt.29-03-2018 30.12.2017.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the In-Charge, Additional Sessions Judge-II, Siwan, in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 608 of 2017. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T