← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4161/2025disposed

Preeti Devi @ Priti Devi @ Priti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-18Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4161 of 2025 ====================================================== Preeti Devi @ Priti Devi @ Priti Kumari Wife of Dilip Ram A resident of Dharampura, P.S.- Dharampura, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Mission Director, Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission, Fifth Floor, Bhumi Vikas Bank, Patna.

3.

The Deputy Director (Welfare), Saran.

4.

The Collector/District Welfare Officer, Saran. 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer/Sub-Division Welfare Officer (Incharge Mahadalit), Chapra, Sadar.

6.

The Block Development Officer/The Executive Officer, Manjhi, Saran. 7.

The Incharge/The Block Welfare Officer, Manjhi, Saran. 8.

Pradip Kumar Ram, Son of Ganesh Ram, A resident of Dharampura, P.S.- Dharampura, District- Saran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Harish Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC-8 For respondent No.2 :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 18-03-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for Bihar Mahadalit Vikash Mission are present.

2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, according to Clause XII of the Vikash Mitra Chayan Margdarshika, the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the District Magistrate/Mission Director, Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission (respondent No. 2) for redressal

Patna High Court CWJC No.4161 of 2025(2) dt.18-03-2025 2/2 of the petitioner's grievances.

3. Learned counsel for the State and Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission jointly submit that the appropriate remedy for the petitioner lies before the said authority, as provided under Clause XII of the Vikash Mitra Chayan Margdarshika.

4. As such, the writ petition stands disposed off, granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate authority, in accordance with law. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U