← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/590/2024dismissed

Smt Kumari Hema Devi @ Kumari Hema v. The State Of Bihar,Through The Principal Secretary,

2026-07-24Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.590 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3954 of 2022 ====================================================== Smt Kumari Hema Devi @ Kumari Hema Wife of Yoganandan Kumar Yogesh @ Yog Nandan Kumar Yogesh Resident of Village - Gudiya, P.S. - Jadia, District- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar,through the Principal Secretary, Viz Shri Chaitanaya Prasad, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director General of Police, Viz.Shri Rajwinder Singh Bhatti, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Divisional Inspector General, Viz. Shri Pankaj Sinha, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

4.

That District Arms Magistrate-Cum-District Magistrate, Viz. Shri Kaushal Kumar Supaul.

5.

The Superintendent of Police Viz. Shri Shaishav Yadav, Supaul. 6.

The Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Viz. Shri Shambhu Nath, Triveniganj, Supaul.

7.

The Sub - Divisional Police Officer, Viz. Shri Chandra Shekhar Prasad Vidyarthi, Triveniganj, Supaul.

8.

The Station House Officer Viz. Rajeev Kumar Jadia Police Station, Supaul. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the State :

Mr. M.N.H. Khan, SC-1 Mrs. Babita Kumari, AC to SC-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-07-2026 The learned counsel for the opposite parties submits by referring to the show-cause filed in the present case that the application of the petitioner for grant of arms licence has already stood rejected vide order dated 30.05.2024, passed by the District Magistrate, Supaul, hence the order of this Court dated 19.12.2022, passed in CWJC No. 3954 of 2022 has stood

Patna High Court MJC No.590 of 2024(3) dt.24-07-2026 2/2 complied with.

2. This Court finds that neither the counsel for the petitioner is present nor any rejoinder affidavit has been filed, rebutting the aforesaid stand taken by the opposite parties, hence this Court is satisfied that the order of this Court dated 19.12.2022 has stood complied with.

3. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U