Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22462/2017dismissed

Ravish Kumar @ Rabish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-11Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22462 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -15 Year- 2017 Thana -PAKARIBARAW District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Ravish Kumar @ Rabish Kumar Son of Vahoran Paswan @ Bahoran Paswan, Resident of Village- Kudheta, Police Station- Pakri Barawan, District- Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar For the Informant :

Mr.Amresh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Pakri Barawan P.S.Case No.15 of 2017 for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is about assault on the injured, who is victim girl.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that actually there was love affair between the parties and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of the family members of the injured. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody for about three months.

Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22462 of 2017 (2) dt.11-05-2017 2/2 informant. They have opposed the prayer for bail stating that altogether 09 injuries were found on the person of the victim girl. Having heard both sides and in view of allegation as well as considering the injuries on the person of the victim girl, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner is in custody for more than three months, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U