Prahalad Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20058 of 2016 ====================================================== Prahalad Prasad Son of Late Mit Lal Yadav, Resident of Village- Misi, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Collector, District- Patna.
3.
The Sub Divisional Officer S.D.O., Sub-Division-Barh, District- Patna. 4.
The Circle Officer, Circle Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna. 5.
The Circle Inspector, Circle Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna. 6.
The Revenue Karmchari, Concerned Gram Panchayat of Gram PanchayatMisi, Bakhtiyarpur, District- Pat 7.
The Anchal Amin Anchal Bhatiyarpur, District- Patna. 8.
Sri Rajmani Prasad, son of Ram Charitar Singh, Resident of Village- Misi, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-08-2025 Heard Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, learned GP-18 representing the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):
"for issuance of writ/ writs certiorari or appropriate in nature of directing and commanding to the respondents for measurement of the land bearing Khata No. 255 and 206
Patna High Court CWJC No.20058 of 2016(2) dt.25-08-2025 2/2 Khesara no. 2482 and 2483 area 19 decimal situated at village- Misi, P.S-Bakhtiyarpur, District Patna for which the circle officer Bakhtiyarpur, District-Patna has earlier directed on 08.02.2013 to deposit measurement fee Rs.1,000/- in measurement case no. 25/2012-13 and the petitioner has deposited rupees one thousand on 20.05.2013 in Anchal Nazarat, Anchal Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna but ignoring this fact till the date the measurement of the said land has not been done by the respondents."
3. The petitioner as also the State both concede that the grievance has been redressed.
4. In that background, the writ petition stands disposed of treating it to infructuous.
(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U