Sikandar @ Sikandar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31822 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -434 Year- 2006 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Sikandar @ Sikandar Kumar, Son of Shri Ramadhar Singh, Resident of Village-Nawada, P.S.-Sahar, District-Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-05-2016 Heard Sri Amit Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, invoking inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 22.04.2013 passed in Sessions Trial No.1138 of 2010 arising out of Danapur P.S. Case No.434/2006 registered for the offence under Sections 364(A)/365 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no direct accusation against the petitioner. The petitioner has been implicated in the case only on the ground that the petitioner was in touch with some of the accused persons on Mobile, whereas a plea has been that the petitioner in business context had

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31822 of 2013 (2) dt.06-05-2016 2/2 telephonic discussion with the accused persons. There was nothing relating to commission of offence.

Besides hearing learned counsel for the parties, I have also perused the impugned order. I do not find any apparent error warranting interference. The petition stands dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U