← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11980/2026disposed

Sania Priyadarsi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-24Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11980 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-584 Year-2025 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Sania Priyadarsi Wife Of Sri Lakshmi Narayan @ Lakshmi Narayan Ram R/O Village- Haridaspur, P.S.- Khagaul, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and allegation is of recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a Scooty. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from her conscious possession and she came to be implicated based on the fact that she is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use her own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11980 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/3 create evidence against herself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that Vivek would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged, who was also apprehended from the spot along with Ricky. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 584 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 7.

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed her antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11980 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 3/3 anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T