Dukhan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22352 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAURADANO DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Dukhan Yadav Son of Rupnarayan Rai, Resident of Village- Katahariya, P.S. Chauradano, District East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2017 Heard both sides.

The petitioner seeks bail in Chauradano P.S. Case No. 14 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 366-A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner along with Pramod Yadav is alleged to have kidnapped the victim. The victim made her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. but she did not disclose that the petitioner ever assaulted her physically or sexually. The petitioner is in jail since 25.02.2017 but it appears from perusal of the statement of the victim that the victim, herself, stated that the petitioner and Pramod Yadav kidnapped her at the point of dagger and wanted to marry with her. The petitioner also bite on her neck and confined

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22352 of 2017 (3) dt.29-06-2017 2/2 her in a room for many days.

Considering the facts aforesaid I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above named on bail at this stage. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after remaining nine months in custody.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T