Satyam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12514 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2025 Thana- Ramgarh Chowk District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Satyam Kumar, Son of Bibhuti Singh, Resident of Village - Sharma, P.S.- Tetarhat District - Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Ramgarh Chowk P.S. Case No. 145 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 27 and 25(9) of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that a photo and a video clip were received through mobile in which 18-20 persons were celebrating birthday party on an unknown vehicle. In the said party, people were using abusive languages and thereafter one round firing was done on which all the persons were dancing.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that one Manish

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12514 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/2 was identified in the video as the person who was firing. When police reached there, it was informed that the petitioner was also there and on that basis, he has been framed in this case. It is also clear from the order of the learned trial Court that the petitioner has also given his confessional statement. It has also been submitted that save and except the confessional statement, nothing is there against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. He is languishing in judicial custody since 18.08.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Ramgarh Chowk P.S. Case No. 145 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T