Satyanarayan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7928 of 2018 (2) dt.08-02-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7928 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -178 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Satyanarayan Rai, son of Sri Ramchandra Rai, resident of Village- Yadopur Bakhri, P.S. Dhaka, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Excise Case No. 178 of 2017, registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

The accusation is of recovery of 110 bottles, each containing 300 ml, Nepali Soufia from the dickey of the motorcycle, on which, two persons were found sitting. On seeing the police party, they started to flee away, but on chased, one person was apprehended, who disclosed his name as Sudama Rai and also disclosed the name of this petitioner, who succeeded to flee away.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7928 of 2018 (2) dt.08-02-2018 petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive and he is in custody since 14.12.2017. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 7th Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Special Judge, Excise at Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Excise Case No. 178 of 2017. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T