Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Police Bihar, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.249 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Pankaj Kumar Son of Sri Mithlesh Kumar @ Mithlesh Yadav Yadav, is minor son and under the guardianship of her mother Meena Devi resident of village - Rikhai Tola, P.S. Dulhin Bazar, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home (Police) Bihar, Patna

2. The Director General and Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. The Additional Director General of Police ( Head Quarter ), Bihar, Patna

4. The Inspector General of Police, Patna Range, Patna

5. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Patna Range, Patna

6. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna

7. The Superintendent of Police, Rural, Patna

8. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paliganj, Patna

9. The Station House Officer, Dulhin Bazar Police Station, Patna

10. Akhilesh Kumar, S.I., Presently Posted as S.H.O., Dulhin Bazar Police Station, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No. 13, Adv Mr. Rohit Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shyam Kishore Sharma (GA- 1) Mr. Mayank Rukhaiyar, AC to GA-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 08-04-2016 Heard Mr. Manish Kumar No.13, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Mayank Rukhaiyar, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate No.1, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. After some argument, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.249 of 2016 (2) dt.08-04-2016 2/2 future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) K.C.jha/- U T