Md. Faiyaz Nasim @ Faiz Nasim And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.245 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Md. Faiyaz Nasim @ Faiz Nasim Son of Nasim Ahmad,

2. Naseem Ahmad, Son of Late Md. Abul Hassan,

3. Rasida Praveen, Wife of Naseem Ahmad, All residents of Mohalla - Mogalpura, Co-operative Colony, Fauzari Kuan, Police Station - Khajekalan, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

2. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

3. The Superintendent of Police, East, Patna.

4. The S.D.P.O., Patna City, Patna.

5. The Officer- in - Charge of Khajekalan Police Station, Patna.

6. The Investigating Officer of Khajekalan P.S. Case No. 284/2014.

7. Zeeshan Anjum, Son of Md. Najmul Hassan, Resident of A-23, Anand Vihar, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi - 110059.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar, Adv.

Mr. Radhey Krishna Jha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Singh (GP-16) Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, AC to GP-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 20-06-2016 Heard Mr. Harish Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, and Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Assistant Counsel to learned Government Pleader No.16, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. After some argument, learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.245 of 2016 (4) dt.20-06-2016 2/2 of law as may be permissible.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioners to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) K.C.jha/- U T