← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15484/2024allowed

Md. Tauqeer @ Adil Nadeen @ Adil Nadeem v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-15Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15484 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2023 Thana- RUDRAPUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Tauqeer @ Adil Nadeen @ Adil Nadeem Son Of Late Abdul Jabbar R/OHarna, P.S.-Rudrapur, Distt.-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Jha Raman For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey (App.84) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 224, 225, 353, 324, 341, 323, 307, 354, 355, 332, 333, 216, 509 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with other co-accused persons have created hindrance by attacking upon the police officials by means of lathi, danda and sword to make free Md. Taukir (petitioner), who was also an accused in Rudrapur P.S. Case No. 120 of 2022.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. General and omnibus allegations have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15484 of 2024(3) dt.15-05-2024 2/2 been levelled against him. He was only a member of the mob. Injury received by the lady constable in palm is simple in nature. In fact, petitioner was in custody of police at the time and place of alleged occurrence, so this is highly unbelievable that he had attacked upon the police officials.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that petitioner is a habitual offender as 12 more cases are pending against him

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail after framing of charge, if not framed, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Rudrapur P.S. Case No. 123 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U